Poemander

To lead the people, walk behind them.

The world of dreams is made of stones:

Opals, turquoise, lapis lazuli.

Concave and convex shapes and forms,

Shades labyrinth neath soaring domes,

Devoted songs rouse guides unruly.

Inside this world gems flow like river,

In crystal ponds they glow pristine.

Conquer, conquire tiny sliver

From every couplet clandestine.

Beyond the dreams lies world of wind

Soothfast to pillage, strip and rind

To bare bones and your dismay:

Buran, Chinook, Khamsin, Gregale.

Just is this breath that shams unlay,

delusions yarn unwind.

To fly with them need no device,

Need no conspicuous plan or craft,

And upon taking this advice,

The feathered heart shall soar with waft.

Beneath the winds splays world of sea

Whose depths you feel buy never see.

Primordial waters of the dark:

Lapetus, Rheic, Tiamat,

Tethys, Danu,

I drown in you, it's only what you feel is true.

So close you eyes and dream away,

Dip down your toes in milky way.

Skim over marshes and quagmire,

Take gulp of galaxies viscous.

Yet deeper still burns world of fire,

If left unquenched one last desire,

Agni, Aed, Svarog and Ra,

Devour in flames what's left thus far

Of memories, regrets, convoke:

From ashes in the hot Fornax in smoke

Rises the old new Phoenix.

On fiery wings it takes you higher,

To world of Nix that souls inspire.

From aether I the lines indite,

Agate and Onyx rule the night.

On the surface, borrowing is indistinct from rent. Both imply to take and give back. Indeed the word rent derives it's meaning from 'render', which is to provide or give back. The word 'borrow', however, alludes to some different perspective: just consider, coming from Proto-Indo-European and reflected in old Slavonic 'brego', the root 'bhergh' has the ultimate meaning of 'protect', 'guard' and 'safe-keep'. Not surprisingly, the words 'bury', 'burrow', 'harbor' and 'borrow' are all of the same origin. And while there is some semantical consistency about the word 'rent', the word 'borrow' seems to have deviated or even reversed the original meaning: “who is protecting whom?”, we naturally ask ourselves.

If the matter is about the safekeeping of a borrowed item, does it not appear that the borrower is the one providing the service, just the way bank provides customers with the safety box and ought to be rewarded for the service? It could be, however, that the more appropriate concept in such situation would be a deposit. The word 'borrow' traditionally implies that a borrower is asking a lender and not the other way round, i.e, natural question would sound like, “can I borrow your xyz?” rather than, “will you borrow my xyz? It's becoming now clearer that the distinction here is based on matters of need: who has what and who needs what. A lender has the item and a borrower has the need. But does the bank really need depositor's funds? The distinction is vast, the distinction is usage.

Can a borrower or a deposit-taker generate “use” from the item? If not, than it is a safe-keeping or a custody, if yes than it is in fact a rent. In this context, you can't change the word 'usage' for the word 'benefit' because benefit is very subjective; that's what brought us in this semantic mess to begin with. But shall we not get tied up in this epistemological nonsense.

Rent is straightforward, rent is usage and usage is consumption. In the grand scheme of things, private ownership is a legitimized usurpation of rent: every resource or product is 'rented' in order to be used for its deemed purpose and 'returned back' in condition commensurate to its age at the end of rent period, i.e. when rent payments have ceased. If you 'own' a house your rent payment is the original purchase price and the ongoing maintenance (up-keeping) costs, once these have expired, the house disintegrates (literally or metaphorically) returning materials and the land back to nature 'in condition commensurate to their age'. Of course, land remains land, and your “ownership” over it never seems to expire, hypothetically, but this is where the trick is: land, if not for the sophistry of language, isn't meant to be owned, but to be looked after, in a custodian way.

Now, coming back to our “deemed purpose”, do we not see that this is indeed a crux and a point of distinction? Ownership, thus far, makes this 'deemed purpose' pretty much obsolete, implying, among others, the right to destroy if desired so. Again, in the grand scheme of things, nothing truly perishes, and only changes form, yet from the moral perspective, the idea of ownership supplies this corruptive power to decide someone or something-else's fate, which clearly does not resonate the same way with the concept of rent. The idea of a legitimised ownership has opened up a moral division, like a rift in a landmass, separating further and further the absurdity of this dogma from the designs and laws of nature.

All rent is consumption, all purchases is a form of advance rent on consumption – the need meets the settlement. You rent the time and the skill of a hairdresser as you consume the service, pay now, during or immediately after. Debt is past consumption and future settlement, investment is past settlement future consumption (you, your children or beneficiaries will ultimately consume the investment). Debt is besieged with waiting, thus is the jitter, the uncertainty and the ingrained subjectivity of measurement. Benefit, obligation, debt: all became the reverse type of psychology interlaced with morale, religious subordination and the reliance on arbitration from the authority. It breaks down even further: a borrower appears to be the one 'in need' or a 'debit' from the standpoint of moral accounting. A lender, on the other hand, can afford 'not to need' the item at least for a time being and thus can be viewed as in surplus or be a 'credit'. Interestingly enough, the word 'loan' and 'lend' can be traced back to Old English 'laen', meaning a gift, thus reinforcing the lender's original premise of ownership with powers of generosity over the borrower's position of need. Rent has no generosity, no begging.

From here on things begin to hastily disintegrate: first moral accounting justifies the fictional schism and inevitably follows with the proposal of building a bridge made to support all sort of private and/or commercial arrangements. It, somehow, never seemed strange that this bridge would be built of the same material which failed miserably many times before and wasn't fit to bridging anything but expectations and despair. Nevertheless, such oxymoron is real and has a respectable name, it is called “interest”. We all are so used to it that we have taken it for granted. We have even been provided with the economics of incomprehensible abracadabra explaining how the interest is actually a rent on money. It is not, by the way, interest is a fee on fear, that's what it is, but it doesn't have to be this way.

Monetary interest has exhausted its potential, believe it or not. We, ladies and gentlemen, are here touching the artefact; in a few generations or so, interest will be on museum's display. I am no revolutionary, I am simply stating the obvious: interest is cumbersome, counterproductive and archaic. Despite being inherently subjective and unreliable as a measure it is built into financial modelling . As such, interest and the associated instruments are weighting heavily on international trade, skewing the balance of power towards the selected few while singlehandedly destroying every meaningful attempt to humanitarian progress.

Let me outline the following 3 criticisms:

1. Interest is more of a moral dilemma than an economical axiom.

Throughout history interest played a role of 'surety' where the lack of trust would undermine the socio-economical profit sharing. In other words interest is a fee on fear, except the one who fears actually collects the fee, just like insurance, only the other way round. Enough said of the moral toll of debt and the defunct reverse accounting. What's clear is that interest, being a mere projection is inherently subjective and truly belongs in the realms of wishful-thinking. Constructive metrics, instead, are based on arrears and the real-time.

2. Interest is resource hungry.

Consider that interest consists of two parts: time-value for money (aka the dubious risk-free rate) and the risk portion (i.e. how risky is the borrower in the eyes of a lender). In a semi-closed system (where most resources are limited except for few) the time-value generally makes sense cause it represents the natural profit obtained by the borrower in the time period, or you can say a profit not earned by the lender should the asset have remained in his/her possession. Peculiarly though, in a hypothetical closed system profit or surplus is not at all possible and only an aggregate replacement can be achieved at best. Under such circumstances neither the time-value nor the risk portion will have any grounds. As some commentators suggest, interest represents the 'offsprings' in original sense of, perhaps, a borrower obtaining livestock and returning back with the offsprings. Still, this is vague since we don't know how many offsprings are required back and what happens if no offsprings. Yet, this gives us a decent idea about the time-value as a measure of 'average', and thus a likely expected productivity of an associated asset in a given time. In the very same system (we'll consider the semi-closed system for sanity sake) the risk portion would represent the requirement to deliver more than 'average' productivity. Where would this portion come from in the recourse constrained system, is my question? Yet it has to come from somewhere, be it theft, robbery or cost cutting (starvation?) if no expansion is available. No wonder the defaulted borrowers were often deemed criminals. Logically though, the lender is the one at fault by charging above normal in the constrained environment, yet moral accounting positions things otherwise. So the expansion has to always compensate for this undue strain, and there ain't many ways to expand that we know of: exploitation of labour and natural resources, war, currency wars – all the usual suspects. New technology may provide a temporary boost to growth, but this doesn't change the overall mechanism. Therefore we say that interest is resource hungry.

3. Interest is counterproductive and is a poor conduit of commerce.

To make it simple: conglomerates only exist because of access to cheap capital. It has been pointed out numerously that little to no economical substance exists in combining the unrelated businesses, yet the reality proves otherwise and the reality is hinged on disproportional effect of preferential interest rates. How would you call someone quoting different interest rates to different people? A financier. How would you call a car hire agent quoting different hire fees to different customers? A crook! The result is disastrous: access to capital not skill or expertise dictates the undertaking of particular projects. The tendency feeds the vicious cycle of overcapacity where lower rates lead to over-investment at high prices and rising rates, the subsequent supply glut and lower prices with the resulting period of underfunding and lower rates. Skill shortages across industries or nation-wide unemployment, trade wars have their roots in this same artificial overcapacity. Commodity cycles too are feeding of this credit cycle, which acts as propeller causing this turbulence and powered of the interest – a two-stroke motor fueled by the constant fear of collapse and oiled by the pseudo-scientific mixture of archaic tradition and extrapolated probabilities. The commodity cycle is the most obvious because it is close to our mouth, so to say, it is the resources of everyday need. Property, other asset classes undergo similar cycles, yet stipulated by the periodicity of actual use case.

The old rusted engine of interest is deafening, even sentimental to our ears as we are so accustomed to the whizz of its credit propeller. No, I'll have the jet engine of immediate settlement which offers much better consistent thrust and an uncompromised speed. To travel the horizons infinite, we must set our time scales to real-time. Transition is inevitable.

Ice shall move, but so brittle

Soils for sowing in the field.

Flooded gates, yet seedlings whittle:

Acres toiled for no yield.

Winds shall change, but the people:

Hopes adrift in the swarm.

Tossed and turned around steeple,

Crowded beds keep'em warm.

Far too late, a little early

To get up in the night.

Alleys out there seem way eerie,

To pretend pelts worth the fight.

Bells shall toll, but for the living:

Marbles scattered in the yard.

Those who left need not forgiving

For they knew how to depart.

For the one in a million, what's a million to one?

A fluke, a stroke of luck you'd say.

But no, I can't rely on fate, no pun,

My certainty is single shot: draw! fire away!

How many will go loosed before the very last?

A shiver, like parenthesis defines the apprentice.

What I have snagged along as outcast,

Restrain, refrain, retain, call masterpiece.

No, I shan't succumb to secular tendencies.

Whats value in prestige, acknowledgment and fame

To someone who lives life accepting consequences,

Not seeking mercy from the mobs, and who to blame?

You'd say, get real and get a life, look at statistics.

But, tell me, what's the use in numbers to a living soul?

Of singularity, born into the world of mystics.

Go on, Keep trying making sense of orders tall!

Can you take chances in this game if not for trophies?

Miss out on the millions and wait for the thrill,

Till someday someone releases detainees,

Locked up in these lines, convicts of my quill.

Till that day my soul shall crave of the home.

While doing her time, she'll shed tears a million.

Wherever they fall, rock softens to loam,

Go on, plant this seed, one shot in a million!

Infinity is the concept that changes everything, everything we know, everything we have done and everything we will ever do. Science refers to the Universe as an observable universe and sees it expanding. The expansion rate can be measured. So the logic and evidence is that the universe appeared from a very condense mass with an enormous amount of energy. And then, it has exploded, resulting in the expansion we are witnessing now. Fine, but there is a childish question that has never been coherently answered from the position of science: what was outside of that condense ball of mass when explosion happened and what do we call that space where this expansion is spreading into? I can tell you, the best word we have to call that space is 'infinity'. Because it is not really a space but a concept rather. Same story with time. What do we call that time before the universe appeared? The time began with the appearance of the universe, isn't it? So, what was there before? Some kind of other time, or no time? Again, it is 'infinity' or the 'eternity' as we call the infinity of time. Infinity stretches further then space and time, it, in fact, doesn't need space or time because it is accomplished in these dimensions, they provide nothing new to it. Space and time do not exist in the infinity without / outside of the observer.

Hold on, but what about entropy and the arrow of time? Isn't it a mathematical and physical law that order moves to disorder and the multiplicity increases in the system moving to equilibrium? Yes, but it is not relevant in the infinity. Infinity is already at equilibrium, because when there are infinite number of states and probabilities, the quantitative and probabilistic interpretations loose their significance, i.e. it no longer matters that the probability of rolling a dice with the combination of seven dots is higher than the combination of two dots (six vs just one). Therefore, the infinity's equilibrium is not necessary in the the most probable state, it can well be in the most improbable state. Imagine a coin landing on its edge – very low probability; however, it doesn't mean the same for infinity, where even 1 in a million chance has the same and not lesser occurrence than 9 out of 10. So, despite being somewhat counterintuitive, infinity can be said to be accomplished and not uncertain since there is not a thing that can be precluded from it. By the way, it appears to me that only infinity can have full and indisputable certainty, i.e. everything is only probable unless infinite/eternal.

There is no question unanswered in the infinite, eternal universe, likewise, there is no question not yet raised. And any question we have about the condition of the universe is truly more so is a question about the condition of an observer. What we now came to consider as the beginning of space and time is indeed the observational bias rather, an event horizon to those on the inside. You see, in order to disconnect from this bias, one needs to acknowledge a simple truth concerning the infinity as such. This bias is stipulated by the idea that a scale of things does matter, however, scale anything to infinity and suddenly no scale can be applied. Big and small are no longer the defining characteristics. Same with the eternity of time: slow or fast – no difference. No difference at all! Let this sink in, infinity is not concerned with the scale. It is workable and perfectly executable at any scale, no matter which reference point you choose, no matter the physics and the mechanics because those are too an observational biase. And if one can't see past the big bang is only because your observational bias and the scales do not conform to the scope of things beyond the finite comprehension.

Imagine, a mosquito that could reflect on its own life lasting just a day or two; would it think that it's life is too short or would it see one day as if it was a century long and those living more than a day to be immensely old? Now, extrapolate this line of thinking and try to fit the life of entire civilizations in a mere second of ours. Bizzare? Not quite if you have no scale and no reference. And this is how the eternity of time works: no scale, no reference. Go on extrapolating and keep narrowing the funnel, past the big bang, past the immense pressure and immense heat, past the trillions of lightyears collapsed into a single quark, past the event horizon and past the time lapse, yet the lines never converge, no matter how close they come, the funnel's walls do not merge continuing to recede further and further into the ever-scalable infinity. In other words, singularity is only an imaginary road post signifying the change of scale sort of thing. And the worlds of immense vastness will comfortly fit and thrive inside the millisecond of a big bang with their laws of physics, intelligent life, space travel and the deliberations about the origin of the universe. To us their life is a fluke and to them our existence is inconceivable nothingness. Similarly, aeons later, our vast universe will appear not bigger than a poit of a needle, a Planck era of sorts, to the beings on the next scale. To them our stars will seem no less elusive than quarks and our vacuum will feel denser than centre galactic black hole. Yet, their world will not be separate from the present universe, nor our present universe is in anyway disconnected from the one prior. Despite a totally different physical realities, they are a representation of one and the same infinity.

Are there other universes with their own infinite worlds? Who knows? Perhaps, one infinity is good enough

Zero is the origin of all. Zero is a fundamental and irrefutable truth that contains all. All things are numbers and they all belong in zero. It has no shape, no reference point, yet it is the beginning of every coordinate. It is best depicted by circle with the undefined centre and thus the undefined diameter. Being boundless it has no size while containing every probability. All probabilities combined translate into a certainty of an absolute. Occupying such an encompassing domain, zero is not concerned with logic and proof for which numbers exist; therefore, zero is not a number. It is not affected by numbers: divide or multiply and it remains a zero, instead, like a black hole it consumes numbers big or small. Yet, bring it into the logic of numbers as a placeholder, and zero continues to transpire its might by infinitely magnifying or diminishing any number.

For something to appear you need a point of reference; however, a point is undefinably small or large, boundless, just like a zero. This hints to an idea how everything comes from zero – through a point of reference. But one point is not enough, you need at least the two for any kind of manifestation; one cannot provide reference without the other. For this reason, one on its own too is not a number. One needs two to become a number. One is a distance between point one and point two. Thus, one is depicted in Chinese and Indus Valley (Arabic) numericals by a straight line which allegorically means unity, a unit. Zero too is a unity but of an undefined unit. The difference between the one and the zero is what the difference is between the straight line and a curve, between the Euclidian and non-Euclidean geometry; the former is the manifestation of the later within a locality, or as a two dimensional representation of a spherical distance. Hence the need for a diameter, or a straight line – to represent. One is the representation of zero, like the diameter is the representation of a circle. For this reason, pi is inherently undefined as there is no direct connection between two completely different realities of a circle and a straight line, the reality of potential and the world of representations, the world of numbers. Zero is all numbers latent. One is zero manifest. One is a crowned king of the phenomenal world, it rules and declares, just like the diameter declares the size of a circle, but it needs a cohort, one is powerless on its own, it is meaningless on its own: ever thought of why king only moves one step in the game of chess? Because it is confined in one step, one move, one state, one kingdom, one world. Dividing or multiplying by one has no effect on original number, but is essential to holding their values intact.

Two refers to the polarities, opposites, twins. Two points of reference is the minimum required in obtaining the coordinate. Without the two everything is a unity where there is no need for any reference. Only when you have the two, you can compare, refer, analyze. Without the two no thought process is possible. Unity is mindless because any thought would collapse onto itself with no distance to run. Number two opens this distance, opens polarity. Therefore, number two metaphorically, is the beginning of the world as we know it: it is a marriage of Uranus, the sky, and Gaia, the earth. Number two is the dualistic quality of our reality with the pairs of opposites, which upon merging become unity. Ancients knew it too well: yin and yan, as above so below, cause and effect – among the few ways to explain the so-called opposing forces as truly a quality of one. If you dwell on one side, you are still bound by the requisites of the other, in other words, you cannot have the right without the left, the up without the down, justice without injustice, god without devil; it is nonsense to imagine one without the other. Number two is a prerequisite of sense, order, reason.

Number three is a deeper dimension of number two. It is the insight that opens a third dimension in the otherwise flat reality of the opposites. Not surprisingly, three was always associated with the intuition, insight, luck. You'll find many stories about the three brothers or the three sisters with the third always being the luckiest, the most genuine. Three has a penetrating quality of the fire with the triangle itself bearing the association with the fiery element. Starting from the ground fire is burning upwards, so is number three, rooted in reason and logic of the two, it shoots upward opening a new perspective, not by negating the logical axioms, but by offering the higher altitudes of the established principles.

Where three is the representation of space consisting of three dimensions, four is the representation of time. Since the end of the golden age, time has greater power than space, hence is the higher numerical hierarchy. Being a dimension itself, time also has a four-dimensional structure. It goes in circles, or more accurately completes a quadrant. Thus the cycle of four seasons, four yugas, four stages of life: growth, maturity, decline, death. Chinese know too well that four is death because four is a completed cycle, or the forth corner of a quadrant. This may sound at first somewhat counterintuitive, but four cardinal directions also originate from the concept of time which has an imprint on land measures (think of latitudes and longitudes measured in minutes), nautical mile, for instance, spans one minute of the latitude; meter, imperial foot and many other linear measurements are directly derived from the circumferential measurements and the arch-minutes of the dimensions of Earth. This is especially evident if you consider that square is a face of the hexahedron which relates to the earth element. Also, only quadrangle gives the sum of angles of three hundred sixty degrees which are used to measure earth's circumference or any cyclical phenomena, including time, for this matter . Four horsemen of apocalypse similarly represent time or the unstoppable eras of growth – the conquest, maturity – war, decline – famine and death. The lamb of god is the number three preceding the next four open seals of time. The unopened three seals are the unrealized and yet latent dimensions of numbers eight, nine and ten. Therefore, the lamb of god is the representation of the three-dimensional space, whereas the four horsemen unleash one by one the four dimensions of time making it all together seven, or the universe as we know it. The three remaining seals are still dormant possibilities of the universe on which we can hardly even speculate in our present state.

Cross too relates to the realm of four dividing the circle in four equal parts it symbolizes the cyclical nature of time, the merging of the end and the beginning, the greater order of the universe. These are the pagan crosses. Christian cross, however, is very different; it relates to number six (6 faces of a flattened cube). it has an inbuilt imbalance with the displaced central point, necessitating a second center and the two circles for a tangent fit. It is in fact the crux of our time symbolizing the distorted perception of reality. You can fit it in a parallelogram but not in a circle. If you circumscribe each plank you will end up with two inscribed circles smaller inside the larger bordering on one side. They form a crescent and a little cross or a star with the striking resemblance to the Islamic symbol. Not surprisingly, both are traced to the Abrahamic and earlier Mesopotamian tradition with the cubic symbolism relating to Saturn and it's hexagram (2-dimensional cube). Thus far it goes, but it resides in duality where the Christian symbol gets stuck not offering any further outlet in contrast to a symmetrical pagan cross which harmonizes itself with the square of phenomena and the circle of the world of noumena.

Five is the number of man, or a human as we now are obliged saying to preclude the misinterpretation of the word so simple. This obligation I, however, am prepared to neglect not out of disregard to the better half of humanity but out of impossibility to following every whim and demand of the increasingly impatient subjects. So, being above the three and the four, man has a rule over three-dimensional space, yet is locked within the layers of time. Man has created numerous machines to move about the three dimensional space, but has failed to come up with anything suitable for time-travel. The reason being, man is lacking the overview of time like he has of the space. Man, as he is, cannot disintegrate himself from the whirlpool of time in order to obtain his bearings. For time-travel, the same technique is not suitable, it requires a different kind of vehicle, and man is too clumsy in his present state to fit into this vehicle.

However, it would be incorrect to say that man has absolutely no control over the time: interlocked with the space, time is not separate from the first three dimensions of existence, so there is multitude of situations where people can experience the distortions of time flow within their 'normal' parameters. Just take air travel: one can depart eastward with the sunset and arrive to another destination at sunrise of the next day after only have travelled for a few hours, whereas those left at home are still asleep in their beds; alternatively you depart westward, at sunrise, to arrive after some good ten hours of travel with the same sunrise in a completely different destination – now tell me if this is not a time-travel? Number five is potential, like a glass half full or half empty. So is man having potential in the order of cosmic hierarchy. Vitruvian man is a clear representation of a perfect match between the human body and the geometry of the square and the circle. Square, the earth element and is the 'framework' where man is a 'cross'. Circle is a universe where man is a pentagram, or a 'star', the quintessence (5th element) and the aether, so to say.

Six is insight and intuition, like three, but on a deeper level – mirror reflection. Depicted with the two inverted triangles, six harmonizes and magnifies the dualistic quality of number two and the sharp perspective of number three (3 X 2). Properties of number six are seeming almost magical from the height of the five. Six is halfway through the dimensions of time and thus can transcend layers impenetrable to preliminary numbers. For its extrasensory abilities it is associated with the third eye or the sixth chakra. Six also means wisdom for its ability to merging the opposites. Man, on level five, is capable of reaching out to his surrounding numbers, four and six.

Seven is the crown of our world, it sits atop the time and the space. Man has no reach to it; therefore, being also the seventh chakra, it is depicted above the head. Anyone reaching for it must have abandoned the personality and the human attributes altogether. For this matter it was mentioned that a camel may pass through the eye of a needle but 'rich man' will not enter the kingdom: seven is this kingdom and the 'rich man' is any man or woman 'rich' with possession of human's ego or personality. Camel, may have loads of carriage and the humps, but the animal hasn't got the ego thus not burdened with a particular shape and will pass through the 'gateless gate'. Seven, similarly to number three, is associated with luck, but on a higher level and rightly so because luck is beyond reach of the mind. You can use reason to deduce chance by understanding the probabilities, but you cannot use reason to deduce luck. A cube has six sides, yet seven is necessary to complete the structure of a manifested world and if you roll two standard dice, the combination of seven has the greatest probability of any number despite seven by itself doesn't exist on any individual face of the dice. Seven notes, seven colors, seven classical planets, seven days of the week, seven heavens, seven archangels, seven roman numeral glyphs, the list can go on: all relate to an accomplished structure!

Deviating slightly from the topic, I should mention that the above structure is carefully preserved by number one hundred thirty seven as the mathematical reciprocal of fine structure constant. No matter which measure you use, this constant reveals itself throughout the known and unknown universe, from the atomic valencies to the speed of light. One hindered thirty seven is a physical limit of the universe just about on any level of beingness. Not surprisingly, this number seems to 'hold' the universe together with 'one' being the principal of manifestation, or active versus latent; 'three' is the three-dimensional space containing 'fire' or the 'incipient spirit'; 'seven' is an accomplished sequence containing three dimensions of space and four dimensions of time. Eight and nine are outside of known and unknown universes in the realms still latent, thus 137 is itself a complete measure and all encompassing constant of our world. This constant does not expand or contract until (or from) it is 'introduced' to the realms of eight and nine. Those realms, however, are outside of our universe in space and/or time. They lie dormant in the depths of black holes and outside of the big bang.

It is rather pointless trying to expand on the eight and the nine, nevertheless:

Eight is associated with the continuum, infinity and thus with the transcendence. It is above space-time, yet it is still based in duality. Eight immortals of Chinese lore are resonating with the same concept of the infinity of the eight. Mortal or finite forms can only reach seven at their highest. Interestingly enough, the story of a Snow White and the seven gnomes can very well be based on this Chinese legend, meaning nothing less, but an initiation into realm of immortality and the transcendence of the eight.

Nine is inaccessible altogether even on subjective plane. It is an absolute in numerical form, so to speak. Having such a fine and potent structure, nine esoterically, not only transcends matter, but in fact touches the divine. Add all numerals 1 to 8 and you get 36, which itself is 9 (3+6). Take a sum of angles from any polygonal and you can divide it by 9 ( for instance 4 X 90 degrees of a square gives 360, which is divisible by 9, same with any other polygon). In essence, 9 belongs to the objective realm of a circle, achieving absolute singularity across any plane or form. In layman terms, eight is infinity and nine is absolute.

I wanted to be with you,

I wanted to be by your side,

See the sweet dreams of you,

Glide on the edge of the night.

I wanted to walk your streets,

I tried hard to feign being here,

But my heart couldn't fake these beats,

But my feet couldn't bring me there.

Wretched days devour me alive,

Yet nights festoon sky with stars to assuage the pain.

I fancied to end this life,

But none of such tricks would undo the chain.

Hence, I shall be the one or be nobody,

Turn into a prey or the predator.

To return the favour give back forcibly,

There's no half-way, it's impossible.

People will not evade death. They need death like a breath of fresh air. Death is absolutely necessary, it is a reset, like a reset of a computer. Without this reset the memories will start clogging the perception, consciousness, all operating functions and the system will come to a halt. It will freeze causing a tight gridlock unresolvable unless turned off. As technology develops, people will find ways to trick death, but none of these will lead to immortality; instead, they will lead to distortions, system failures and the natural resolution: death. People will learn how to upload the individual ego into a storage; this is not very far, there are machines already that learn people's behavior and can reconstruct the habits of an individual. So if ego is a combination of all behavioral traits than it won't be long until these can be saved and downloaded back into a new carrier. But, this is a 'no through' road: these seemingly revolutionary inventions will cause stagnation of the natural evolution, of the intellect and the spirit. Those who achieve this kind of immortality will inevitably come to a point of committing a suicide. No reward or entertainment can substitute a real purpose: meeting yourself. You cannot carry on kicking the can down the road, feeding yourself with the surrogates of the real experience. Nature will eventually snap taking back its modeling material needed elsewhere in its grand design.

Nature is anything which is you. Nature works its way through balance. That's why tree is a representation of nature, rooted in the ground and reaching for the sky, a tree is balancing out this world, the world of archetypes. To human, tree is a teacher, a spiritual parent. For this reason, to us, it is the 'tree of life'.

Earth is humanity's mother, she nurtured us, fed us with breast milk. We grew and she watched us growing. We are now adolescents and think of going our way, but no matter how far we'll travel, we'll never be able to renounce our origin.

Sun is our father, or the son of our grandfather – the Great Father. Sun brought humans into being and provided us with our needs.

Moon is our sister, she is close enough to observe, to talk to and to learn from, yet far enough to inspire and impress.

Plants are earth-beings. Their consciousness is on communal rather than individual level, for this reason they are highly interconnected which makes plants very sensitive to the impulses of the Earth, Cosmos and all other beings. Plants are experiencing reality on the other level than animals: they are incredibly more sensitive to intentions and can instantly translate information within their networks. Plants are infinitely beneficial to humans and animals because they integrate and repair the information fields. Plants 'do not mind' to be consumed or integrated, so to say, as long as it is done with deep understanding, i.e. proper respect on emotional level.

Animals are people stripped of humanity, they are our original selves, our basic structure and our DNA. Without the awareness of the self, that spark, humans always fall back to their basic nature – animal.

Animals are ninety nine percent people, except they are 'stuck' in the loop of their short-term memory – this is their band. Humans are in the next band, they are also 'stuck' in it due to the limitations of available to them memory. Should any of them access deeper, or higher for this instance, bands of memory they will be able to shift their beingness to another band – this is no esoteric, this is all nature, inherent in every being.

Unrecognisable obsession,

Attraction, to the point of destruction.

If I call out every name

They'd rather lock me up or frame.

But not this time, I seek no fame,

My spirit is a hungry flame:

With lewd tongue it swallows shame.

Frivolities of wicked game.

Beyond repair – take me there

Lame, broken piece of grand fanfare.

A meager fluke, misfired flare.

I know one thing – I'm not from here.

Origin timeless and no name

Declare me not, since we're the same,

Like Mephistopheles who came

Before the world knew who to blame.

Contemptuous regard on every face.

Acclaim just to hide disgrace.

I represent this human race

And praying not for coup de grace.

A mercy is misapprehension,

I trace a path no guidebooks mention,

Awoken in this strange dimension,

Where one ascends by condescension.

No, mercy and forgiveness saved for those,

Who follow steps, not those who chose

To take it further than the prose,

And lead beyond the human cause.

Among all choices, I suppose,

Being chosen is the hardest choice.